Samoa vs South Sudan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Samoa
0 million t per person
in 2025
South Sudan
0 million t per person
in 2025
Samoa rank
69th
South Sudan rank
72nd
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Samoa
- South Sudan
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 million t per person.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Samoa ahead.
Samoa ranks 69th and South Sudan ranks 72nd of 200 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Samoa or South Sudan?
- Samoa, at 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Samoa and South Sudan?
- 0 million t per person, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Samoa and South Sudan rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Samoa ranks 69th and South Sudan ranks 72nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.