Serbia vs Zambia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Serbia
0.0001 million t per person
in 2025
Zambia
0.0001 million t per person
in 2025
Serbia rank
54th
Zambia rank
52nd
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Serbia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.0001 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Serbia, a difference of 0 million t per person.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 54th and Zambia ranks 52nd of 200 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.0001 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Serbia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.0001 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Serbia and Zambia?
- 0 million t per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zambia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Serbia and Zambia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Serbia ranks 54th and Zambia ranks 52nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.