Sri Lanka vs Sudan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Sri Lanka
0 million t per person
in 2025
Sudan
0 million t per person
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
152nd
Sudan rank
149th
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 million t per person.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 152nd and Sudan ranks 149th of 200 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Sri Lanka or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 0 million t per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sudan rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Sri Lanka ranks 152nd and Sudan ranks 149th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.