Sub-Saharan Africa vs Suriname: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Sub-Saharan Africa
0 million t per person
in 2025
Suriname
0.004 million t per person
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st
Suriname rank
2nd
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.004 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.004 million t per person.
That makes Suriname's figure about 94.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 2nd of 2 groups.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 million t per person | 0.0061 million t per person | 0.0059 million t per person | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.0001 million t per person | 0.0051 million t per person | 0.005 million t per person | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.0001 million t per person | 0.0045 million t per person | 0.0045 million t per person | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0 million t per person | 0.0041 million t per person | 0.0041 million t per person | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Sub-Saharan Africa or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.004 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Sub-Saharan Africa and Suriname?
- 0.004 million t per person, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Suriname?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Suriname rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 2nd of 2 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.