Armenia vs Uruguay: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Armenia
0.0006 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0006 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Armenia rank
150th
Uruguay rank
151st

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Armenia
  • Uruguay
0000.001199020062023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0.0006 million t per square kilometre against 0.0006 million t per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 150th and Uruguay ranks 151st of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Armenia
2000s 0.0005 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Armenia
2010s 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Armenia or Uruguay?
Armenia, at 0.0006 million t per square kilometre against 0.0006 million t per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Armenia and Uruguay?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uruguay?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Uruguay rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Armenia ranks 150th and Uruguay ranks 151st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Uruguay: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/armenia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/armenia/uruguay/">Armenia vs Uruguay: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.