Aruba vs Pakistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Aruba
0.0002 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
0.0002 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
171st
Pakistan rank
169th
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time
- Aruba
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0002 million t per square kilometre against 0.0002 million t per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Pakistan ahead.
Aruba ranks 171st and Pakistan ranks 169th of 200 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | 0 million t per square kilometre | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | 0 million t per square kilometre | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | 0 million t per square kilometre | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | 0 million t per square kilometre | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Aruba or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.0002 million t per square kilometre against 0.0002 million t per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Aruba and Pakistan?
- 0 million t per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Pakistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Pakistan rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
- Aruba ranks 171st and Pakistan ranks 169th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.