Aruba vs Somalia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.0002 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia
0.0002 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
171st
Somalia rank
170th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Somalia
000.0010.001199020062023

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 0.0002 million t per square kilometre against 0.0002 million t per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Somalia's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Somalia has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 171st and Somalia ranks 170th of 200 countries.

Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Somalia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0.0008 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre Somalia
2000s 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0.0007 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Somalia
2010s 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Somalia
2020s 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Aruba or Somalia?
Somalia, at 0.0002 million t per square kilometre against 0.0002 million t per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Aruba and Somalia?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Somalia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Somalia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 171st and Somalia ranks 170th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Somalia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/aruba/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/aruba/somalia-fed-rep/">Aruba vs Somalia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.