Australia vs Norway: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Australia
0.0013 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0013 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
119th
Norway rank
117th
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time
- Australia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0.0013 million t per square kilometre against 0.0013 million t per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 119th and Norway ranks 117th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0013 million t per square kilometre | 0.001 million t per square kilometre | 0.0003 million t per square kilometre | Australia |
| 2000s | 0.0013 million t per square kilometre | 0.0011 million t per square kilometre | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.0013 million t per square kilometre | 0.0013 million t per square kilometre | 0 million t per square kilometre | Norway |
| 2020s | 0.0013 million t per square kilometre | 0.0013 million t per square kilometre | 0 million t per square kilometre | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Australia or Norway?
- Norway, at 0.0013 million t per square kilometre against 0.0013 million t per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Australia and Norway?
- 0 million t per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Norway?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Norway rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
- Australia ranks 119th and Norway ranks 117th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.