Bahamas vs El Salvador: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0021 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.0022 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
95th
El Salvador rank
92nd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • El Salvador
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0022 million t per square kilometre against 0.0021 million t per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 95th and El Salvador ranks 92nd of 200 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Bahamas or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0.0022 million t per square kilometre against 0.0021 million t per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Bahamas and El Salvador?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and El Salvador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and El Salvador rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 95th and El Salvador ranks 92nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs El Salvador: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/el-salvador/">Bahamas vs El Salvador: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.