Bahamas vs Nicaragua: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0021 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.0021 million t per square kilometre
in 2022
Bahamas rank
95th
Nicaragua rank
93rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Nicaragua
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.0021 million t per square kilometre against 0.0021 million t per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 95th and Nicaragua ranks 93rd of 200 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0008 million t per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Bahamas or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 0.0021 million t per square kilometre against 0.0021 million t per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2022.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Bahamas and Nicaragua?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Nicaragua?
33 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
How do Bahamas and Nicaragua rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 95th and Nicaragua ranks 93rd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Nicaragua: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/nicaragua/">Bahamas vs Nicaragua: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.