Barbados vs China: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Barbados
0.001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
China
0.001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
130th
China rank
128th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • China
000.0010.0010.001199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.001 million t per square kilometre against 0.001 million t per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 130th and China ranks 128th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China Difference Ahead
1990s 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0007 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0008 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Barbados or China?
China, at 0.001 million t per square kilometre against 0.001 million t per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Barbados and China?
0 million t per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 130th and China ranks 128th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.