Barbados vs Malawi: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Barbados
0.001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
130th
Malawi rank
127th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Malawi
00.0010.0010.002199020062023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.001 million t per square kilometre against 0.001 million t per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 130th and Malawi ranks 127th of 200 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0016 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0012 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0011 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Barbados or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.001 million t per square kilometre against 0.001 million t per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Barbados and Malawi?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malawi?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Malawi rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 130th and Malawi ranks 127th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Malawi: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/barbados/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/barbados/malawi/">Barbados vs Malawi: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.