Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0044 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0041 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
45th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
48th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
00.0010.0020.0030.004199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0044 million t per square kilometre against 0.0041 million t per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0003 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Belarus ranks 45th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 48th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0034 million t per square kilometre 0.0011 million t per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0038 million t per square kilometre 0.0009 million t per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0.0035 million t per square kilometre 0.004 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.0041 million t per square kilometre 0.0041 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Belarus, at 0.0044 million t per square kilometre against 0.0041 million t per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
0.0003 million t per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 45th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 48th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.