Belarus vs Georgia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0044 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
0.0045 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
45th
Georgia rank
44th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Georgia
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005199220072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0045 million t per square kilometre against 0.0044 million t per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 45th and Georgia ranks 44th of 200 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.004 million t per square kilometre 0.0017 million t per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0042 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0035 million t per square kilometre 0.0044 million t per square kilometre 0.0009 million t per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.0041 million t per square kilometre 0.0045 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Belarus or Georgia?
Georgia, at 0.0045 million t per square kilometre against 0.0044 million t per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Belarus and Georgia?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 45th and Georgia ranks 44th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Georgia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/">Belarus vs Georgia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.