Belgium vs Nicaragua: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Belgium
0.0022 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.0021 million t per square kilometre
in 2022
Belgium rank
91st
Nicaragua rank
93rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • Nicaragua
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0.0022 million t per square kilometre against 0.0021 million t per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Belgium ranks 91st and Nicaragua ranks 93rd of 200 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Belgium or Nicaragua?
Belgium, at 0.0022 million t per square kilometre against 0.0021 million t per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Belgium and Nicaragua?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nicaragua?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Belgium and Nicaragua rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 91st and Nicaragua ranks 93rd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Nicaragua: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/belgium/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/belgium/nicaragua/">Belgium vs Nicaragua: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.