Bhutan vs Congo: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Bhutan
0.0083 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0088 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
18th
Congo rank
15th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Congo
00.0020.0040.0060.008199020062023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0088 million t per square kilometre against 0.0083 million t per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0005 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 18th and Congo ranks 15th of 200 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0071 million t per square kilometre 0.009 million t per square kilometre 0.0019 million t per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.008 million t per square kilometre 0.0089 million t per square kilometre 0.0009 million t per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0083 million t per square kilometre 0.0089 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0083 million t per square kilometre 0.0088 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Bhutan or Congo?
Congo, at 0.0088 million t per square kilometre against 0.0083 million t per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Bhutan and Congo?
0.0005 million t per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Congo rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 18th and Congo ranks 15th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Congo: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/congo-rep/">Bhutan vs Congo: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.