Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0041 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0041 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
48th
New Caledonia rank
50th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • New Caledonia
00.0010.0020.0030.004199020062023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0041 million t per square kilometre against 0.0041 million t per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 48th and New Caledonia ranks 50th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0034 million t per square kilometre 0.0039 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.0038 million t per square kilometre 0.0039 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.004 million t per square kilometre 0.004 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.0041 million t per square kilometre 0.0041 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Caledonia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0041 million t per square kilometre against 0.0041 million t per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 48th and New Caledonia ranks 50th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.