Botswana vs Guam: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0026 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam
0.0026 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
80th
Guam rank
81st

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Guam
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0026 million t per square kilometre against 0.0026 million t per square kilometre in Guam, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guam ahead.

Botswana ranks 80th and Guam ranks 81st of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Guam in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Guam Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0033 million t per square kilometre 0.0007 million t per square kilometre Guam
2000s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0033 million t per square kilometre 0.0007 million t per square kilometre Guam
2010s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0028 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Guam
2020s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Botswana or Guam?
Botswana, at 0.0026 million t per square kilometre against 0.0026 million t per square kilometre in Guam as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Botswana and Guam?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Guam?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Guam rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 80th and Guam ranks 81st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Guam: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/botswana/guam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/botswana/guam/">Botswana vs Guam: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.