Botswana vs Tuvalu: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0026 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.0027 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
80th
Tuvalu rank
77th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Tuvalu
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 0.0027 million t per square kilometre against 0.0026 million t per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 80th and Tuvalu ranks 77th of 200 countries.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0027 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0027 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0027 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0027 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Botswana or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 0.0027 million t per square kilometre against 0.0026 million t per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Botswana and Tuvalu?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tuvalu?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Tuvalu rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 80th and Tuvalu ranks 77th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Tuvalu: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/botswana/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/botswana/tuvalu/">Botswana vs Tuvalu: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.