Botswana vs United States: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0026 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
0.0025 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
80th
United States rank
82nd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • United States
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0026 million t per square kilometre against 0.0025 million t per square kilometre in United States, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 80th and United States ranks 82nd of 200 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana United States Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0019 million t per square kilometre 0.0007 million t per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Botswana or United States?
Botswana, at 0.0026 million t per square kilometre against 0.0025 million t per square kilometre in United States as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Botswana and United States?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and United States?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Botswana and United States rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 80th and United States ranks 82nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs United States: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/botswana/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/botswana/united-states/">Botswana vs United States: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.