Canada vs El Salvador: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Canada
0.0023 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.0022 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
90th
El Salvador rank
92nd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Canada
  • El Salvador
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.0023 million t per square kilometre against 0.0022 million t per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 90th and El Salvador ranks 92nd of 200 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Canada or El Salvador?
Canada, at 0.0023 million t per square kilometre against 0.0022 million t per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Canada and El Salvador?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and El Salvador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Canada and El Salvador rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 90th and El Salvador ranks 92nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs El Salvador: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/canada/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/canada/el-salvador/">Canada vs El Salvador: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.