Cayman Islands vs Estonia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
0.0035 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia
0.0036 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
60th
Estonia rank
58th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Estonia
00.0010.0020.0030.004199020062023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0036 million t per square kilometre against 0.0035 million t per square kilometre in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cayman Islands ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 60th and Estonia ranks 58th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0036 million t per square kilometre 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Cayman Islands
2000s 0.0036 million t per square kilometre 0.0034 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Cayman Islands
2010s 0.0036 million t per square kilometre 0.0037 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 0.0035 million t per square kilometre 0.0036 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Estonia?
Estonia, at 0.0036 million t per square kilometre against 0.0035 million t per square kilometre in Cayman Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Estonia?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Estonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Estonia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 60th and Estonia ranks 58th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Estonia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/estonia/">Cayman Islands vs Estonia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.