Chile vs Nepal: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Chile
0.0032 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.003 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
68th
Nepal rank
71st

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Nepal
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0032 million t per square kilometre against 0.003 million t per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0.0002 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 68th and Nepal ranks 71st of 200 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0031 million t per square kilometre 0.0028 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0.0028 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Chile or Nepal?
Chile, at 0.0032 million t per square kilometre against 0.003 million t per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Chile and Nepal?
0.0002 million t per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nepal?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and Nepal rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 68th and Nepal ranks 71st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nepal: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/chile/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/chile/nepal/">Chile vs Nepal: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.