Chile vs Rwanda: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Chile
0.0032 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.0031 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
68th
Rwanda rank
69th
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time
- Chile
- Rwanda
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0032 million t per square kilometre against 0.0031 million t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 68th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 200 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0031 million t per square kilometre | 0.0017 million t per square kilometre | 0.0014 million t per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.0032 million t per square kilometre | 0.0018 million t per square kilometre | 0.0014 million t per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0032 million t per square kilometre | 0.0021 million t per square kilometre | 0.0011 million t per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0032 million t per square kilometre | 0.0029 million t per square kilometre | 0.0003 million t per square kilometre | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Chile or Rwanda?
- Chile, at 0.0032 million t per square kilometre against 0.0031 million t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Chile and Rwanda?
- 0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 68th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.