Chile vs Sweden: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Chile
0.0032 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0033 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
68th
Sweden rank
66th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Sweden
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0033 million t per square kilometre against 0.0032 million t per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 66th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0031 million t per square kilometre 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0.003 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0.0033 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Chile or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0033 million t per square kilometre against 0.0032 million t per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Chile and Sweden?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sweden?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sweden rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 66th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sweden: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/">Chile vs Sweden: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.