China vs Maldives: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

China
0.001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
0.001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
128th
Maldives rank
131st

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Maldives
000.0010.0010.001199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.001 million t per square kilometre against 0.001 million t per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Maldives ahead.

China ranks 128th and Maldives ranks 131st of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Maldives Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 0.0007 million t per square kilometre 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 0.0008 million t per square kilometre 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, China or Maldives?
China, at 0.001 million t per square kilometre against 0.001 million t per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between China and Maldives?
0 million t per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Maldives?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Maldives rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
China ranks 128th and Maldives ranks 131st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Maldives: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/china/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/china/maldives/">China vs Maldives: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.