Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0067 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.0071 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
23rd
Malaysia rank
21st

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Malaysia
00.0020.0040.0060.008199020062023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.0071 million t per square kilometre against 0.0067 million t per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0004 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 23rd and Malaysia ranks 21st of 200 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0063 million t per square kilometre 0.0075 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.0064 million t per square kilometre 0.0069 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0.0066 million t per square kilometre 0.007 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0.0067 million t per square kilometre 0.0071 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 0.0071 million t per square kilometre against 0.0067 million t per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Malaysia?
0.0004 million t per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malaysia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Malaysia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 23rd and Malaysia ranks 21st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/malaysia/">Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.