Costa Rica vs Peru: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0067 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0062 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
23rd
Peru rank
25th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Peru
00.0020.0040.0060.008199020062023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0067 million t per square kilometre against 0.0062 million t per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.0005 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Peru ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 25th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0063 million t per square kilometre 0.0069 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre Peru
2000s 0.0064 million t per square kilometre 0.0066 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Peru
2010s 0.0066 million t per square kilometre 0.0064 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0067 million t per square kilometre 0.0062 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Peru?
Costa Rica, at 0.0067 million t per square kilometre against 0.0062 million t per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Peru?
0.0005 million t per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Peru?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Peru rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 25th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Peru: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/peru/">Costa Rica vs Peru: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.