Cuba vs Puerto Rico: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Cuba
0.0025 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0.0025 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
85th
Puerto Rico rank
83rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Puerto Rico
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0025 million t per square kilometre against 0.0025 million t per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 85th and Puerto Rico ranks 83rd of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Puerto Rico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0018 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0018 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0024 million t per square kilometre 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Cuba or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 0.0025 million t per square kilometre against 0.0025 million t per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Cuba and Puerto Rico?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Puerto Rico?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Puerto Rico rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 85th and Puerto Rico ranks 83rd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Puerto Rico: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/cuba/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/cuba/puerto-rico-us/">Cuba vs Puerto Rico: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.