Ecuador vs Japan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.0055 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
0.0056 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
31st
Japan rank
30th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Japan
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.0056 million t per square kilometre against 0.0055 million t per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 31st and Japan ranks 30th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Japan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0058 million t per square kilometre 0.0035 million t per square kilometre 0.0024 million t per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.006 million t per square kilometre 0.0043 million t per square kilometre 0.0016 million t per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0057 million t per square kilometre 0.0052 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Japan?
Japan, at 0.0056 million t per square kilometre against 0.0055 million t per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Japan?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Japan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Japan rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 31st and Japan ranks 30th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Japan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/japan/">Ecuador vs Japan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.