Ecuador vs New Zealand: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.0055 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0058 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
31st
New Zealand rank
29th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Zealand
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0058 million t per square kilometre against 0.0055 million t per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0003 million t per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 29th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0058 million t per square kilometre 0.0052 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.006 million t per square kilometre 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0057 million t per square kilometre 0.0057 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0.0058 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Ecuador or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0058 million t per square kilometre against 0.0055 million t per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Ecuador and New Zealand?
0.0003 million t per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 29th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Zealand: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/new-zealand/">Ecuador vs New Zealand: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.