Ecuador vs East Timor: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.0055 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.0053 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
31st
East Timor rank
34th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • East Timor
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0055 million t per square kilometre against 0.0053 million t per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.0002 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 31st and East Timor ranks 34th of 200 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0058 million t per square kilometre 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.006 million t per square kilometre 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0057 million t per square kilometre 0.0054 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0.0053 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Ecuador or East Timor?
Ecuador, at 0.0055 million t per square kilometre against 0.0053 million t per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Ecuador and East Timor?
0.0002 million t per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and East Timor?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and East Timor rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 31st and East Timor ranks 34th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs East Timor: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/timor-leste/">Ecuador vs East Timor: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.