El Salvador vs United States Virgin Islands: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.0022 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
United States Virgin Islands
0.0023 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
92nd
United States Virgin Islands rank
89th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • United States Virgin Islands
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

United States Virgin Islands currently reports 0.0023 million t per square kilometre against 0.0022 million t per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

That makes United States Virgin Islands's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 92nd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 89th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and United States Virgin Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0009 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0011 million t per square kilometre 0.0011 million t per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0016 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, El Salvador or United States Virgin Islands?
United States Virgin Islands, at 0.0023 million t per square kilometre against 0.0022 million t per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between El Salvador and United States Virgin Islands?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and United States Virgin Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 92nd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 89th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs United States Virgin Islands: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/virgin-islands-u-s/">El Salvador vs United States Virgin Islands: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.