Estonia vs Guatemala: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Estonia
0.0036 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.0037 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
58th
Guatemala rank
56th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Estonia
  • Guatemala
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0037 million t per square kilometre against 0.0036 million t per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 58th and Guatemala ranks 56th of 200 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0.0047 million t per square kilometre 0.0015 million t per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.0034 million t per square kilometre 0.0042 million t per square kilometre 0.0008 million t per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.0037 million t per square kilometre 0.0038 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.0036 million t per square kilometre 0.0037 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Estonia or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.0037 million t per square kilometre against 0.0036 million t per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Estonia and Guatemala?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Guatemala?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Guatemala rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Estonia ranks 58th and Guatemala ranks 56th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Guatemala: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/estonia/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/estonia/guatemala/">Estonia vs Guatemala: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.