Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Eswatini
0.0012 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0013 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
121st
Sri Lanka rank
118th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sri Lanka
00.0010.0010.002199020062023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0013 million t per square kilometre against 0.0012 million t per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Eswatini ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 200 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 0.0012 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0.0012 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Eswatini or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0013 million t per square kilometre against 0.0012 million t per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Sri Lanka rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sri-lanka/">Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.