Ethiopia vs Singapore: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Ethiopia
0.0021 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0019 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
97th
Singapore rank
100th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Singapore
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0.0021 million t per square kilometre against 0.0019 million t per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0002 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 97th and Singapore ranks 100th of 200 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0.0019 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre Ethiopia
2000s 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.002 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Ethiopia
2010s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0019 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Ethiopia
2020s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0019 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Ethiopia or Singapore?
Ethiopia, at 0.0021 million t per square kilometre against 0.0019 million t per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Ethiopia and Singapore?
0.0002 million t per square kilometre, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Singapore?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Singapore rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Ethiopia ranks 97th and Singapore ranks 100th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Singapore: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/singapore/">Ethiopia vs Singapore: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.