Finland vs Guinea-Bissau: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Finland
0.0029 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
0.0028 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
72nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
75th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.0029 million t per square kilometre against 0.0028 million t per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Finland ranks 72nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 75th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.003 million t per square kilometre 0.0008 million t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0028 million t per square kilometre 0.0028 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0028 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Finland or Guinea-Bissau?
Finland, at 0.0029 million t per square kilometre against 0.0028 million t per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Finland and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Guinea-Bissau?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Finland and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 72nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 75th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Guinea-Bissau: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/finland/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/finland/guinea-bissau/">Finland vs Guinea-Bissau: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.