Finland vs Rwanda: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Finland
0.0029 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.0031 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
72nd
Rwanda rank
69th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • Rwanda
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0031 million t per square kilometre against 0.0029 million t per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0002 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 72nd and Rwanda ranks 69th of 200 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0017 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0.0018 million t per square kilometre 0.0007 million t per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0028 million t per square kilometre 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0007 million t per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Finland or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.0031 million t per square kilometre against 0.0029 million t per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Finland and Rwanda?
0.0002 million t per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Rwanda?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Finland and Rwanda rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 72nd and Rwanda ranks 69th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Rwanda: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/finland/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/finland/rwanda/">Finland vs Rwanda: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.