Georgia vs Latvia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Georgia
0.0045 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0047 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
44th
Latvia rank
41st

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Georgia
  • Latvia
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005199220072023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0047 million t per square kilometre against 0.0045 million t per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 0.0002 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 41st of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.004 million t per square kilometre 0.0034 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.0042 million t per square kilometre 0.004 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0044 million t per square kilometre 0.0046 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0045 million t per square kilometre 0.0047 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Georgia or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.0047 million t per square kilometre against 0.0045 million t per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Georgia and Latvia?
0.0002 million t per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Georgia ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 41st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Latvia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/georgia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/georgia/latvia/">Georgia vs Latvia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.