Guam vs Puerto Rico: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Guam
0.0026 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0.0025 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
81st
Puerto Rico rank
83rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Guam
  • Puerto Rico
0.0010.0020.0020.0030.0030.004199020062023

How they compare

Guam currently reports 0.0026 million t per square kilometre against 0.0025 million t per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.

Guam ranks 81st and Puerto Rico ranks 83rd of 200 countries.

Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0033 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.002 million t per square kilometre Guam
2000s 0.0033 million t per square kilometre 0.0018 million t per square kilometre 0.0015 million t per square kilometre Guam
2010s 0.0028 million t per square kilometre 0.0023 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Guam
2020s 0.0026 million t per square kilometre 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Guam or Puerto Rico?
Guam, at 0.0026 million t per square kilometre against 0.0025 million t per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Guam and Puerto Rico?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Puerto Rico?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Guam and Puerto Rico rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Guam ranks 81st and Puerto Rico ranks 83rd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Puerto Rico: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/guam/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/guam/puerto-rico-us/">Guam vs Puerto Rico: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.