Hungary vs Mauritius: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Hungary
0.0015 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0014 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
112th
Mauritius rank
115th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Hungary
  • Mauritius
00.0010.0010.002199020062023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.0015 million t per square kilometre against 0.0014 million t per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.

Hungary ranks 112th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0011 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0012 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Hungary or Mauritius?
Hungary, at 0.0015 million t per square kilometre against 0.0014 million t per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Hungary and Mauritius?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Mauritius?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Mauritius rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Hungary ranks 112th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Mauritius: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/hungary/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/hungary/mauritius/">Hungary vs Mauritius: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.