Hungary vs Ukraine: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Hungary
0.0015 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ukraine
0.0015 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
112th
Ukraine rank
110th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Hungary
  • Ukraine
00.0010.0010.002199020062023

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 0.0015 million t per square kilometre against 0.0015 million t per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 112th and Ukraine ranks 110th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0011 million t per square kilometre 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 0.0012 million t per square kilometre 0.0012 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Ukraine
2020s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0015 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Hungary or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 0.0015 million t per square kilometre against 0.0015 million t per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Hungary and Ukraine?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Ukraine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Ukraine rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Hungary ranks 112th and Ukraine ranks 110th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Ukraine: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/hungary/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/hungary/ukraine/">Hungary vs Ukraine: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.