Isle of Man vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Isle of Man
0.0004 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0004 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Isle of Man rank
163rd
Namibia rank
162nd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Isle of Man
  • Namibia
00000199020062023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0004 million t per square kilometre against 0.0004 million t per square kilometre in Isle of Man, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Isle of Man's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Isle of Man ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 162nd of 200 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Isle of Man Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0003 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0003 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0004 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Isle of Man or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0004 million t per square kilometre against 0.0004 million t per square kilometre in Isle of Man as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Isle of Man and Namibia?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Isle of Man and Namibia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Isle of Man ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 162nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Isle of Man vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/isle-of-man/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/isle-of-man/namibia/">Isle of Man vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.