Israel vs Pakistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Israel
0.0002 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
0.0002 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
166th
Pakistan rank
169th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Israel
  • Pakistan
00000199020062023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 0.0002 million t per square kilometre against 0.0002 million t per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 166th and Pakistan ranks 169th of 200 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Israel
2000s 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Israel
2010s 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Israel
2020s 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Israel or Pakistan?
Israel, at 0.0002 million t per square kilometre against 0.0002 million t per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Israel and Pakistan?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Pakistan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Israel and Pakistan rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Israel ranks 166th and Pakistan ranks 169th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Pakistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/israel/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/israel/pakistan/">Israel vs Pakistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.