Kazakhstan vs Malta: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
0.0001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.0001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
183rd
Malta rank
182nd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Malta
0000199020062023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0001 million t per square kilometre against 0.0001 million t per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malta ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 183rd and Malta ranks 182nd of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Malta?
Malta, at 0.0001 million t per square kilometre against 0.0001 million t per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Malta?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malta?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Malta rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 183rd and Malta ranks 182nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Malta: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/malta/">Kazakhstan vs Malta: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.