Kazakhstan vs Palestine: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
0.0001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
0.0001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
183rd
Palestine rank
180th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Palestine
00000199020062023

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0001 million t per square kilometre against 0.0001 million t per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 183rd and Palestine ranks 180th of 200 countries.

Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Palestine
2000s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Palestine
2010s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Palestine
2020s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.0001 million t per square kilometre against 0.0001 million t per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Palestine?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Palestine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Palestine rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 183rd and Palestine ranks 180th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Palestine: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/west-bank-and-gaza/">Kazakhstan vs Palestine: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.