Kiribati vs Tunisia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Kiribati
0.0001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
177th
Tunisia rank
179th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Tunisia
0000199020062023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.0001 million t per square kilometre against 0.0001 million t per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.

Kiribati ranks 177th and Tunisia ranks 179th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Kiribati or Tunisia?
Kiribati, at 0.0001 million t per square kilometre against 0.0001 million t per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Kiribati and Tunisia?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tunisia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Tunisia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 177th and Tunisia ranks 179th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Tunisia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/tunisia/">Kiribati vs Tunisia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.