Latvia vs Liechtenstein: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Latvia
0.0047 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Liechtenstein
0.0047 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
41st
Liechtenstein rank
40th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Liechtenstein
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

Liechtenstein currently reports 0.0047 million t per square kilometre against 0.0047 million t per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Liechtenstein ahead.

Latvia ranks 41st and Liechtenstein ranks 40th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Liechtenstein in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0034 million t per square kilometre 0.0051 million t per square kilometre 0.0017 million t per square kilometre Liechtenstein
2000s 0.004 million t per square kilometre 0.0049 million t per square kilometre 0.0009 million t per square kilometre Liechtenstein
2010s 0.0046 million t per square kilometre 0.0047 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Liechtenstein
2020s 0.0047 million t per square kilometre 0.0047 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Latvia or Liechtenstein?
Liechtenstein, at 0.0047 million t per square kilometre against 0.0047 million t per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Latvia and Liechtenstein?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Liechtenstein ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Liechtenstein?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Liechtenstein rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 41st and Liechtenstein ranks 40th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Liechtenstein: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/latvia/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/latvia/liechtenstein/">Latvia vs Liechtenstein: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.