Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Lesotho
0 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
186th
Saudi Arabia rank
185th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Lesotho
  • Saudi Arabia
0000199020062023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0 million t per square kilometre against 0 million t per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 186th and Saudi Arabia ranks 185th of 200 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Lesotho or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0 million t per square kilometre against 0 million t per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Lesotho and Saudi Arabia?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Saudi Arabia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Saudi Arabia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Lesotho ranks 186th and Saudi Arabia ranks 185th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/saudi-arabia/">Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.