Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Lithuania
0.003 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0032 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0020.0030.004199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0032 million t per square kilometre against 0.003 million t per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0002 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 200 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0022 million t per square kilometre 0.0038 million t per square kilometre 0.0015 million t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0024 million t per square kilometre 0.0035 million t per square kilometre 0.0011 million t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0027 million t per square kilometre 0.0033 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.003 million t per square kilometre 0.0033 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Lithuania or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0032 million t per square kilometre against 0.003 million t per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
0.0002 million t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/zimbabwe/">Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.